From: David Tolpin (dvd@renderx.com)
Date: Thu Mar 20 2003 - 09:50:55 PST
>
> At 05:09 PM 3/17/2003, David Tolpin wrote:
> >At 2003-03-17 16:27 -0800, Lori Wong wrote:
> >>I have an instance where I have a list-item (with
> >>keep-together-within-page="always") that exceeds the length of a page.
> >
> >The W3C Recommendation states this is an overflow error condition and the
> >content exceeding the page length is discarded, not to be formatted. A
> >numeric value of keep is allowed to be broken by exceeding the length of
> >the page, any higher numeric values of keep will still try to be
> >respected. When the keep is broken it is flowed as if the keep were never
> >specified.
It was not me who wrote that. numeric values for keeps are treated as "always"
by XEP. It is either "keep it" (always or a numeric value), or let it loose (auto).
>
> I'd like to, but I'm currently using the empty block to hold an ID to
> keyword a passage - in this case the list-block. Ideally, we should have
> the ID associated with the list-block, rather than an empty block, but I'm
> working with some legacy data... it might be possible to rework the XSLT to
> eliminate the empty block and move the ID into the list-block.
You can postprocess your fo data if you don't have access to the source xsl.
David
-------------------
(*) To unsubscribe, send a message with words 'unsubscribe xep-support'
in the body of the message to majordomo@renderx.com from the address
you are subscribed from.
(*) By using the Service, you expressly agree to these Terms of Service http://www.renderx.com/tos.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Mar 20 2003 - 09:42:07 PST