[xep-support] possible issue with keep-with-next on table-row

Preface: I am using XEP 4.19 (I have developer version with XEP marks on
each page, client has full version)

I have been attempting to apply logic to a table that is rendered in a
two column layout. The logic would:

1. keep the first and second rows in the same columns (always)
2. keep the second-to-last and last rows together in the same column
(always).

The sample I have been working from is client content that has a two
column page master that has text in the first column, the start of a
table at the end of the first column, the remainder of the table in the
second column, and some text to fill out the rest of the second column.

The table/table row code looks essentially like:

<fo:table>
<fo:table-row
keep-with-next.within.column="always"><fo:block>.....</fo:block></fo:table-row>
<fo:table-row><fo:block>.....</fo:block></fo:table-row>
<fo:table-row><fo:block>.....</fo:block></fo:table-row>
     ....
<fo:table-row><fo:block>.....</fo:block></fo:table-row>
<fo:table-row
keep-with-previous.within-column="always"><fo:block>.....</fo:block></fo:table-row>
</fo:table>

This works, as I believe it should. I then tested this code against an
example in the actual BOOK which was used as the example of why the
logic above should be applied, and it did not work. The first row is
orphaned in the first column (in the example in the source content).

The difference I could find is that after the table and the rest of the
para text, there is a switch to ONE COLUMN layout using the
rx:flow-section element.

So, something like:
<fo:block> //this is a section
<fo:block>...some text.....</fo:block>
<fo:table>
<fo:table-row
keep-with-next.within.column="always"><fo:block>.....</fo:block></fo:table-row>
<fo:table-row><fo:block>.....</fo:block></fo:table-row>
<fo:table-row><fo:block>.....</fo:block></fo:table-row>
         ....
<fo:table-row><fo:block>.....</fo:block></fo:table-row>
<fo:table-row
keep-with-previous.within-column="always"><fo:block>.....</fo:block></fo:table-row>
</fo:table>
<fo:block> ... rest of text for section .... </fo:block>
</fo:block>
<rx:flow-section> //one column layout
<fo:block>...</fo:block>
</rx:flow-section>

If I remove the rx:flow-section from the FO by hand and rerun the
example, the logic for keep-with-next works as I expect. I was able to
add a "<fo:block> </fo:block> between the section block and the
rx:flow-section and this has it working as expected... but I wondered if
there was something about the flow-section that is taking precedence
over my keep-with-next.

(please note, I also tried using keep-with-previous on the 2nd row and
keep-with-next on the 2nd to last row just to be sure)

I can ask the client if I can release a snippit of their content/FO, but
if I do, I would like to do so directly to an XEP engineer.

Thank you in advance.

:dr:

-- 
Daniel Reed
Founder/Managing Director
p: +1 617.684.0182 x201
f: +1 814.284.0182
dan.reed@wrycan.com
http://www.wrycan.com
CONFIDENTIALITY: This message and any attachments are the property of 
Wrycan, Inc. They may contain privileged and confidential information 
intended only for the use of the addressee named above. You are hereby 
notified that any use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of 
this message and attachments is prohibited. If you received them in 
error, please notify the sender and delete them immediately.
!DSPAM:87,4f2732d263734243118310!

_______________________________________________
(*) To unsubscribe, please visit http://lists.renderx.com/mailman/options/xep-support
(*) By using the Service, you expressly agree to these Terms of Service http://w
ww.renderx.com/terms-of-service.html
Received on Sun Apr 29 23:49:34 2012